Nature’s Imagination: The Frontiers of Scientific Vision

A person is not explainable in molecular, field-theoretical, or physiological terms alone. With that declaration, Nobel laureate Gerald M. Edelman goes straight to the heart of Nature’s Imagination, a vibrant and important collection of essays by some of the world’s foremost scientists. Eversince the Enlightenment, the authors write, science has pursued reductionism: the idea that the whole can be understood by examining and explaining each of its parts. But as this book shows, scientists in every discipline are reaching for a new paradigm that accounts for the whole–from theindividual person to the universe itself.

Nature’s Imagination gathers together the work of thirteen leading mathematicians, astronomers, neuroscientists, and philosophers, as they discuss the revolution sweeping the sciences. Here Roger Penrose, Oliver Sacks, John Barrow, Gregory Chaitin, Maragret Boden, and others explore how and whyclassic reductionism is falling by the wayside in their own fields. As Freeman Dyson writes in the introduction, science is an art form, not a philosophical method, and it is always in search of new tools. Reductionism has done its work, and scientists are in search of another. Roger Penrose offersa fascinating account of irreducibility in mathematics, starting with the example of an impossible triangle–a drawing of a triangular object twisted so that could not exist in three dimensions. He breaks the triangle into three parts, showing that each corner is physically possible; only incombination is the triangle impossible. Both Penrose and mathematician Gregory Chaitin explore Godel’s incompleteness theorem–as does John Barrow, who explains that Chaitin’s proof of the theorem shows that, if we ever arrive at a Theory of Everything, there may be a still deeper and simplerunifying theory beyond that. Other contributors discuss the changing thinking in neuroscience, and the limitations of a mechanical view of the mind: as Oliver Sacks writes, if we are to have a model or theory of mind as this actually occurs in living creatures in the world, it may have to beradically different from anything like a computational one. In addition, this volume includes staunch defenders of the classic scientific approach, such as Peter Atkins (The omnicompetence of science, and in particular the simplicity its reductionist insight reveals, should be accepted as aworking hypothesis until, if ever, it is proved inadequate).

The advance of science has been so startlingly swift in the last century that it has begun to approach limits never dreamed of before. This remarkable volume captures the latest thinking on where we must turn if we are to truly understand oursevles and the universe we live in.